China Lays Out Vision for Military

Originally published by The New York Times,31 march 2011

By EDWARD WONG and JONATHAN ANSFIELD

BEIJING — The Chinese military said Thursday that while the security situation in Asia and the Pacific was generally stable, it was becoming “more intricate and volatile,” with no clear solutions for tension points like the divided Korean Peninsula and with the United States increasing its involvement in regional security issues.

The military’s vision was laid out in a national defense white paper, a document published every two years since 1998. The paper tries to walk a line between trumpeting the modernization efforts of the Chinese military and assuaging fears by foreign governments and analysts that the fast-growing People’s Liberation Army will be used for expansionist purposes or regional dominance.

The paper stressed that China’s military buildup is purely defensive in nature, a line that Chinese leaders have long espoused. The paper had more detail than previous editions on China’s attempts to establish confidence-building measures with foreign militaries. In the past year perceptions by foreign countries of China’s military growth and of a more assertive Chinese foreign policy have resulted in diplomatic discord and discomfort, particularly between China and the United States.

“China attaches importance to its military relationship with the United States and has made ongoing efforts towards building a sound military relationship,” Sr. Col. Geng Yansheng said at a news conference on Thursday, reading from a text. “The Chinese military is now taking steps to advance exchanges with the U.S. military this year.”

But “there’s no denying that in developing military relations, we still face difficulties and challenges,” he added.

The white paper observed that in the Asia-Pacific region, “relevant major powers are increasing their strategic investment.”

“The United States is reinforcing its regional military alliances, and increasing its involvement in regional security affairs,” it added.

Colonel Geng said that the army’s Chief of General Staff, Gen. Chen Bingde, would visit the United States in May. Robert M. Gates, the United States defense secretary, flew to Beijing in January to smooth over military-to-military relations that had been frozen after the Obama administration announced arms sales to Taiwan in January 2010. In June Mr. Gates got into a prickly dispute with Gen. Ma Xiaotian at a security summit meeting in Singapore, an episode that revealed the deep fissures in the military relationship.

Mr. Gates had to navigate yet another tricky diplomatic situation here when the Chinese military tested a J-20 stealth fighter jet in Sichuan Province while he met in the Chinese capital with President Hu Jintao.

In December Adm. Robert F. Willard, the commander of United States Pacific Command, told a Japanese newspaper that China had a working design for an antiship ballistic missile that could strike at aircraft carriers and could soon be ready for deployment. The missile, known as a “carrier killer,” has become a symbol in Western military circles of the Chinese army’s technological advances.

The weapon “is not science fiction,” Andrew S. Erickson, a professor at the United States Naval War College, said in an e-mail interview earlier this year. “It is not a ‘smoke and mirrors’ bluff,” he wrote. “It is not an aspirational capability that the U.S. can ignore until some point in the future.”

Of equal or greater import is China’s plan to soon deploy an aircraft carrier known to be under construction. But the white paper, while ostensibly aimed at making China’s military development more transparent, did not discuss the carrier project. Colonel Geng dodged a question about it at the news conference.

The paper noted that China still faced challenges from “separatists” striving for the independence of the restive western regions of Tibet and Xinjiang and the self-governing island of Taiwan.

“Pressure builds up in preserving China’s territorial integrity and maritime rights and interests,” it said. “Nontraditional security concerns, such as existing terrorism threats, energy, resources, finance, information and natural disasters, are on the rise. Suspicion about China, interference and countering moves against China from the outside are on the increase.”

The Chinese government has announced that the military budget for 2011 is about $92 billion, up 12.7 percent from 2010. The previous announced annual increase was 7.5 percent, the first time in years that the reported growth had dipped below double digits.

“China pursues a national defense policy which is defensive in nature,” the white paper said. “China will never seek hegemony, nor will it adopt the approach of military expansion now or in the future, no matter how its economy develops.”

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/world/asia/01china.html?_r=1